An evaluation of methods used by different river forecast centers to calculate reasonable maximum and reasonable minumum forecasts

TitleAn evaluation of methods used by different river forecast centers to calculate reasonable maximum and reasonable minumum forecasts
Publication TypeConference Proceedings
Year of Conference1990
AuthorsHuber, A. L.
Conference Name58th Annual Western Snow Conference
Series TitleProceedings of the 58th Annual Western Snow Conference
Date PublishedApril 1990
PublisherWestern Snow Conference
Conference LocationSacramento, California
KeywordsMultiple regression, Reasonable maximum, Reasonable minimum, Statistics, Water supply forecasting
Abstract

This paper compares methods used by the different river forecast centers for calculating the reasonable maximum and reasonable minimum water supply forecasts. Five procedures used by different forecast centers were identified and evaluated. Results from using the five methods on common watersheds with the same prediction equations are summarized and compared for four forecast dates. Although each method purports to provide estimates of the reasonable maximum and reasonable minimum that would be exceeded only 10 percent of the time, or once every ten years, the actual return periods for the difference methods ranged from 3 years to over 500 years.

URLsites/westernsnowconference.org/PDFs/1990Huber.pdf